ABOUT RAR: For those of
you new to this site, "RAR" is Rick Alan Rice, the publisher
of the RARWRITER Publishing Group websites.
Use this link to visit the
RAR music page, which features original music
compositions and other.
ATWOOD - "A Toiler's Weird Odyssey of Deliverance"-AVAILABLE
NOW FOR KINDLE (INCLUDING KINDLE COMPUTER APPS) FROM
AMAZON.COM.Use
this link.
CCJ Publisher Rick Alan Rice dissects
the building of America in a trilogy of novels
collectively calledATWOOD. Book One explores
the development of the American West through the
lens of public policy, land planning, municipal
development, and governance as it played out in one
of the new counties of Kansas in the latter half of
the 19th Century. The novel focuses on the religious
and cultural traditions that imbued the American
Midwest with a special character that continues to
have a profound effect on American politics to this
day. Book One creates an understanding about
America's cultural foundations that is further
explored in books two and three that further trace
the historical-cultural-spiritual development of one
isolated county on the Great Plains that stands as
an icon in the development of a certain brand of
American character. That's the serious stuff viewed
from high altitude. The story itself gets down and
dirty with the supernatural, which inATWOOD
- A Toiler's Weird Odyssey of Deliveranceis the
outfall of misfires in human interactions, from the
monumental to the sublime.The
book features the epic poem"The
Toiler"as
well as artwork by New Mexico artist Richard
Padilla.
Elmore Leonard
Meets Larry McMurtry
Western Crime
Novel
I am offering another
novel through Amazon's Kindle Direct Publishing service.
Cooksin is the story of a criminal syndicate that sets its
sights on a ranching/farming community in Weld County, Colorado,
1950. The perpetrators of the criminal enterprise steal farm
equipment, slaughter cattle, and rob the personal property of
individuals whose assets have been inventoried in advance and
distributed through a vast system of illegal commerce.
It is a ripping good yarn, filled
with suspense and intrigue. This was designed intentionally to
pay homage to the type of creative works being produced in 1950,
when the story is set. Richard Padilla
has done his usually brilliant work in capturing the look and feel of
a certain type of crime fiction being produced in that era. The
whole thing has the feel of those black & white films you see on
Turner Movie Classics, and the writing will remind you a little
of Elmore Leonard, whose earliest works were westerns.
Use this link.
EXPLORE THE KINDLE
BOOK LIBRARY
If you have not explored the books
available from Amazon.com's Kindle Publishing
division you would do yourself a favor to do so. You
will find classic literature there, as well as tons
of privately published books of every kind. A lot of
it is awful, like a lot of traditionally published
books are awful, but some are truly classics. You
can get the entire collection of Shakespeare's works
for two bucks.
Amazon is the largest,
but far from the only digital publisher. You can
find similar treasure troves atNOOK
Press(the
Barnes & Noble site),Lulu,
and others.
This 1999 interview that Paul Joyce did with Nicole Kidman following the
release of Kubrick's final film, Eyes Wide Shut, is one of the greatest
interviews that I have ever seen. It is almost a movie in itself, made so by the
excellent interview questions posed by Joyce, by Nicole Kidman's naked honesty
and enthusiasm for answering the questions, and by the pressure they were
getting from Kidman's handler to wrap the whole thing up, which Kidman is
unwilling to do, and which gives the whole thing an edgy energy. Kidman seems so
real, and so much the conflicted artist, far more complex than I might ever have
imagined. This is a spectacular look into the impact on a sensitive soul who had
the rare privilege of working with perhaps the most important filmmaker of the
20th century. - RAR
DOCUMENTARY FILMS
Director: Stephen Kessler
(2011)
This documentary begins with the assumption
that 1970s recording/acting sensation Paul Williams
is dead. The director, Stephen Kessler, who
grew up watching the diminutive (5'2") Williams on countless TV shows in that
era, had a deep affection for Williams but hadn't seen or heard of him in years
and so assumed he had "died too young". This extraordinary hole in Kessler's
perception -- Paul Williams is very much alive and is the current President of
the American Society of Composers and Performers (ASCAP) -- is really the
linchpin of this entire, very funny, documentary. Kessler, who has produced and
directed a couple feature films as well as numerous television commercials, is
either afflicted with Aspergers syndrome, or he is a clever and sneaky comic
genius, because much of what makes this train wreck of a documentary so
fascinating is Kessler's inability (or unwillingness?) to recognize the highly
professional Williams' lack of comfort with his documentarian's inability to
create a strategy for telling Williams' story. Williams is a 20-plus years sober
substance abuse patient, who lost his parents when he was very young, was
brought from Nebraska to California to live with an aunt, and stood only 4'6"
tall when he graduated from high school, which is all stuff Williams was willing
to talk about, had Kessler picked up any of the signals, or have he had any
handle on a narrative approach to the film. In the first part of documentary,
Kessler is just sort of invading Williams' privacy by following him around with
a camera. Kessler doesn't seem very interested in who Paul Williams is, or how
he got to be who he is. In fact, Kessler's only real connection to Williams is
that he idolized him as a kid and always imagined what it would be like to be
his friend; or, more to the point, to have a "TV friend". An apparently lonely
kid, Kessler grew up watching a lot of TV, and developed close attachments to
those he saw on the screen. Watching Paul Williams negotiate Kessler's absurd
amateurish behaviors would be uncomfortable viewing were Paul Williams not such
an apparently nice person. In fact, he is kind, and the kindness he shows for
Kessler tends to confirm everything that anybody who grew up watching him on
television always sensed about him. Though Williams was a cocaine-sniffing party
animal, who now cannot bare to watch himself in video of his 1970s television
appearances, his fans heard his real self in those songs that he wrote and sang
("We've Only Just Begun", "Rainy Days and Mondays", "Rainbow Connection", and
many others). Williams was not a good singer -- in fact, wrote corny songs that
were anything but hip -- but his fans loved his courage, wit and bravado,
particularly given his size. He was like all of us who loved him, the regular
folks, the little people. Paul wasn't afraid of the world at all, at least not
that we could see, so maybe being funny and upbeat would work for us, too! Those
sentiments were what Queens-native Kessler apparently felt about Paul Williams,
though Kessler's personal limitations are not his size, but his brain-dead
personality. Williams, haltingly at first, puts up with Kessler, perhaps
thinking that a documentary of his life and career could be pretty nice if only
the person who had elected himself to do the film wasn't such an idiot. But then
something happens. The two bond over a shared love of squid, and Williams starts
to come alive to Kessler, and Kessler begins to relax with Williams. After being
invaded by this guy with a camera for weeks, and obviously questioning himself
for ever getting involved in this documentary in the first place, Paul Williams
starts to like Stephen Kessler. Somehow this feels great to watch, because there
is something about Paul Williams that makes you wish he was your friend, too,
and before our eyes this dream starts to unfold for the oddly unworthy Stephen
Kessler. Then again, Kessler may have been putting us on all along, doing a
Stephen Colbert, portraying a character to create a certain atmosphere for his
film. Whatever, the magic all comes from Williams, who rewards us with the
revelation that he is better now than ever, happier than he has ever been at any
time in his life, and he has utterly shed those aspects of his younger self that
associated him so closely with a wild Hollywood lifestyle. More beautiful yet,
where some triumph over addiction to become preachers, propagandists, and
pontificators -- superior Buddhas of self-love -- Williams has sort of moved on.
He is active in recovery support groups and apparently someone others can reach
out to, but that isn't the vibe one gets from him. He has the keen intelligence
and tolerances of a mature guy who has seen it all and has achieved a balanced
grace. Kessler, whose references are all to Williams in his commercial heyday,
seems to want to explore how Williams feels about not being a big star anymore,
but Paul Williams is way more than that. By the end of this film, you not
only adore Williams, but you come to sort of adore Stephen Kessler, for his
naive innocence -- he is way too old to be naive or innocent -- and that he
starts to seem like Williams' human pet, as if he is a dumb, loyal dog, just
happy to be in his master's presence.
Director: Mike Fleiss
(2014)
As a person who always hated the
Grateful Dead, I sat to watch this Bob Weir
documentary thinking maybe it would tell me something about Weir and
that band he fronted that would finally reveal to me that special something
about them that had previously been revealed to so many of their fans. The
Grateful Dead's main claim to fame was that they had the most dedicated fans in
show business; an army of gypsies who would follow the Dead from show-to-show,
until finally they got to be a security problem for the cities the Dead played.
To many an urban mayor, the Deadheads came to town like an infestation, or a
drug-laden plague, until finally it became less and less easy to get permits for
their shows. So what did these people see in the Grateful Dead? That the
documentary makes a big deal out of young Bob Weir's appeal to girls says
everything anyone would need to know about the overall appeal of the guys in the
band. There was nothing really very special about Weir, other than that he was
surrounded by some real dogs, so in contrast looked all the better. In fact, one
could argue that this same dynamic played out in the sound of the band. This is
a band that used two drummers, for no apparent reason, to produce a sound that
even Weir and Garcia concede was never "current". The two came from the affluent
communities of Atherton and Palo Alto, California, beginning their musical
association in a jug band when Weir was still in high school. They morphed into
a rock band, The Warlocks, played strip clubs in San Francisco and free concerts
in Golden Gate Park -- you'll remember that this was in the Hippie Era circa
1967 -- before then becoming the Grateful Dead. From the beginning, they were
hardly more than the soundtrack for a be-in. The crowd was more interesting than
they were, though to the budding musicians among the legion of Dead fans Jerry
Garcia ranks among the gods of the guitar, with Eric Clapton and the other
"giants". Music giants are always hoisted up by listeners who don't really
know anything about making music, and so it was for the Dead. This video
features sections of Weir demonstrating chord changes on his guitar and any
knowledgeable person will recognize immediately that Weir isn't much of a
musician. Worse than that, he seems brain dead; a guy who couches all of his
memories about his life as "an adventure", which is all he can seem to come up
with. Some of those adventures included following under the spell of
Ken Kesey's Merry Pranksters, and taking LSD
every Saturday for a year. Weir seems to have a special admiration for the
disastrous Neal Cassady, who is most well
known for his association with Jack Kerouac, Allen
Ginsberg, and later with the LSD "movement". Cassady was insane,
likely suffering from a severe bipolar disorder that had him stuck on high, was
occasionally imprisoned on drug charges, and functioned as the resident nut case
for the inspiration of his "writerly" friends. Weir thought he was a genius, but
then Weir was very young and impressionable, and possibly not terribly bright.
Now, as a guy in his late sixties, he seems to function a little bit behind the
beat, as if maybe all those sessions with mind expansion left him with some
unrecovered spaces in his neural connectors. He comes across as more of a victim
than as a fit subject for a documentary. Many biographical documentaries build
their narrative around interviews with friends and associates, but Weir is
pretty much on his own in this one, talking about himself.
Sammy Hagar shows up at one point to sympathize with Weir's plight
as the best looking guy in the band. That is actually the main thing I came away
with from watching this documentary. Sammy Hagar was the best looking guy in
some band? Really? Otherwise, everything about the Grateful Dead makes me feel
kind of like I've been hanging out with Pig Pen.
Director: Greg 'Freddy' Camalier
(2013) Muscle Shoals is a documentary that traces
the development, in the early 1960s, of little Muscle Shoals, Alabama into a Mecca for music recording, particularly
Rhythm & Blues. It was an extraordinary
feat that was accomplished through the sheer willpower of a tough hombre named
Rick Hall, a local guy who founded
FAME studios. Hall grew up in impoverished
conditions and with a nasty chip on his shoulder, and he became a club musician
with a vision for a recording studio. He really blossomed as a producer because
he had a natural sense for the feel and dynamic of each tune he recorded, and he
was a tyrannical perfectionist, demanding take after take of tracks until he heard
the sound that to him sounded like a hit. Hall did many extraordinary things,
not the least of them being that he brought a group of white teenagers together as a
tight studio band (The Swampers), whose
swampy sound helped to break the previously listless career of young
Aretha Franklin. Those kids can be heard on
Franklin's seminal hits "Never Loved A Man" and "Respect". Hall, his studio and
studio band, also breathed life into a young and cantankerous
Wilson Pickett. Hall's early successes with
FAME studios brought him into contact with famed Columbia Records Producer
Jerry Wexler, who would come to be a bitter
rival of Halls and impact the entire rest of his professional life.
Rick Hall was not an easy guy to work with, and the
film traces The Swamper's departure from FAME studios to create a studio of
their own, in Muscle Shoals, which would compete directly with Rick Hall's
business. To Hall it was an act of war. He hired a whole new, largely black
studio band, while The Swampers struggled to get traction with their new
facility. Then the Rolling Stones came to
town to work in the Swampers' studio, where they recorded "Wild Horses", "Brown
Sugar" and two other tracks for their Sticky Fingers LP. An avalanche of
big name recording stars recorded in the Muscle Shoals studios after that, and
new ones were created, most notably The Allmann Brothers and
Lynyrd Skynyrd.
Muscle Shoals, figuratively speaking, was the place where Southern Rock -
roughly meaning Duane Allmann slide guitar style rock - was born.
It is the strange, damaged personality of Rick
Hall that makes this film intriguing, on some levels. It is a little sketchy
trying to figure out what it was about Muscle Shoals that made it a place where
music magic happened, except possibly that it must have been an inexpensive
alternative to other big town studios. The style of recording that came from those studios was fat and
greasy and carried its own raw signature; it had a certain brand of southern
soul. It was a place known for its elimination of music charts, and in that was
a place of a sort of illiterate expression, which most certainly captured a
certain underclass sound of the deep south. What effect that might have had on
the string of pop bands that passed through the area is pretty hard to tell, and
the inability of the film's producers to create that link is certainly the weak
part of this film. Was Muscle Shoals of those early years really just a state of
mind? A southern fried musical legend? Or did the surrounding swamp somehow seep
into those who recorded there to give birth to some kind of musical voodoo?
Director: John Scheinfeld (2010) Harry Nilsson was arguably
the "best" pop singer of the post-Beatles era, which may extend through to
today. It is hard to think of what modern vocalist really ever had his
crystalline range; who could go from a soft bottom to a lilting high with such
purity. The world
has been full of belters of high notes, but that's quite different from what
Harry Nilsson had, which might be described as a piccolo to Freddie Mercury's
trumpet. Listening to Harry Nilsson, one tends to hang on every note because
they are all so delicate. Someone in the film calls it the musical equivalent of
watching a tight rope walker, always uncertain whether or not Harry would fall,
though he never did. His A Little Touch of Schmilsson in the Night LP,
with Gordon Jenkins directing the
London Philharmonic Orchestra through early
20th Century standards, may be the greatest recorded vocal performance of the
last hundred years.
Nilsson recorded that album over the protest of
his producer Richard Perry, with whom he had
achieved breakthrough success with Nilsson Schmilsson. Nilsson, who
showed up in L.A. as a 15-year old homeless Brooklynite, a high school dropout,
had been carving out a niche for himself in west coast music circles since 1962.
He had done studio work with Little Richard, and then caught the attention of
The Beatles when he released a 22-track LP titled Pandemonium Shadow Show,
that included a cover of "You Can't Do That" along with a batch of Harry's own
tunes. He wrote the Three Dog Night hit "One". He scored a hit with "Everybody's
Talking", which became the theme song to the hit movie Midnight Cowboy.
Nilsson, who never toured to perform live based on his feeling that no one would be
interested in seeing him, did appear on a number of television shows in the
1960s, including the short-lived Playboy After Dark, where he did "living room"
performances. Richard Perry had turned Nilsson into a commercial product, but
Nilsson destroyed their relationship by putting out Son of Schmilsson
which largely ignored Perry's direction. Nilsson was then determined to do his
standards album, with an orchestra, while his vocal abilities were at their
finest. Perry felt it wasn't the right time in Nilsson's career for him to be
doing an album like that, and the disagreement ended their association.
Nilsson's story is often recounted as a tragedy:
the upward and downward arc of an alcoholic, drug addict, rock animal. The
documentary consists largely of music celebrities telling outrageous Harry
Nilsson stories. Everyone seemed to know that he was a personal disaster and yet
none seemed inclined to remove themselves from his influence. Nilsson's close
relationship with John Lennon, who produced his Pussy Cats LP (Nilsson,
Lennon and Ringo Starr lived together for a time during the making of this LP),
eventually led to the destruction of Nilsson's golden voice, and after Lennon
was killed Harry Nilsson dropped his music career altogether to become a gun
control advocate.
The documentary is one of redemption, in some
respects, as the abandoned child Harry Nilsson grows up over time and becomes a
doting father. That is, of course, the least interesting aspect of his story.
Director: Tom Donahue (2012)
Documentaries have long focused on subjects who have done great
things, but somehow not been properly recognized, and the maturation of cable
television has created an outlet for these hagiographies. Their merit is now
judged on how effectively they skirt around the essence of what they are, which
is usually a tribute to someone who is well-known enough in the first place for
someone to want to make them the subject of a film. In that, they are a little
like halls of fame. Both make one wonder why these cinematic or brick-and-mortar
recognitions are really needed.
What makes Casting By, the story of
seminal movie casting professional Marion Dougherty, interesting in the least is
the light it shines on how the movie stars we have known over the past 50 years
became movie stars. An incredible number of them, in their New York youths, used
to haunt the hallways of Dougherty's New York City brownstone, where she
proposed them to fill various roles in big feature productions. These would
include Jon Voight, Dustin Hoffman, Al Pacino, Diane Keaton, Christopher Walken,
and many others.
Dougherty was around when the west coast movie
studio system crumbled in the 1950s. The movie business had been developed as a
sort of cottage industry, where studio moguls kept large rosters of actors
under contract. In the studio system, actors were hired to represent iconic
types, and so actors who were hired because they looked like doctors were cast
in doctor roles in movie after movie, and so it was for each character type.
People weren't cast in parts so much as they were selected from menus. And, of
course, in those formative years the studios were cranking out low-budget
features by the trunk load.
Everything changed in the 1950s, when big budget
epic films started to become the rage, and when mature hype machines turned
individual stars into products too big to be controlled by the old studio
system. After the system crumbled, there developed a need for a new type of
casting professional, who would work with film directors to design the character
of a film through the careful selection of freelance actors who could breathe
life into character parts. Dougherty had an uncanny sense for promoting actors
who audiences would come to think of as indispensable to the roles they played.
This documentary concentrates on getting Dougherty a special Academy Award for her work in
casting, for the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has never awarded a
casting category. In fact, filmmakers like the obnoxious
Taylor Hackford have fought against such an
Oscar category on the insistence that casting is subordinate to the movie
director role, a subset, not a separate function. So it is that Dougherty and
others in her field have had to satisfy themselves with screen credits, which
they have not always received. Does that in itself make this documentary
interesting? Not really.
Director: Denny Tedesco (2008)
There was something sort of fundamentally dishonest about the
music coming out of L.A. in that golden period of the late '50s and early '60s.
It was a contrived, canned product, in many respects, and the output of a couple
dozen highly-developed studio musicians who played the music tracks behind
virtually every act that came out of L.A. in that period. Few of the new
generation of song stylists were doing anything more than singing their own
parts on their records, while the studio band called "the
Wrecking Crew"
recorded the tracks. The Beach Boys, The Byrds, The Monkees, and other major
acts of the day, could tour and play live, when the quality of their performance
was less critical, but for studio purposes the difficult work was handled by the
professionals.
The general public was not told this. In fact,
signed bands would show up for their first recording session to find that their
instruments would not be needed. Roger McGuinn and his Rickenbacker 12-string,
which gave The Byrds their signature sound, was allowed to work with the crew,
but he was the exception.
The Wrecking Crew had recording down to a
science. As guitarist Tommy Tedesco told
someone who was astonished at the quickness with which they grasped and executed
a piece of music, "We practice a lot during the day". In fact, the members of
the Wrecking Crew played together every day for years, starting with morning
sessions in one studio, moving to another for an early afternoon session,
another for a late afternoon session, and then on to evening performances and
sessions that would go on into the early morning hours. They worked virtually
around the clock, and this group of musicians, which included
Glenn Campbell on guitar, would become
well-to-do men just collecting union rates because they worked so many hours.
There was one woman among them, the bassist and guitarist
Carol Kaye, who somehow fit seamlessly into
this otherwise all male fraternity.
This film is really carried by Tommy Tedesco, to
whom it is dedicated. Tedesco was a good-humored, blue-collar type of guy, who
took up the guitar later than most but became a sight reader and a
transformative figure in modern pop music. He was key to making the Wrecking
Crew the epitome of music professionalism. He and his mates laid down perfect
tracks for an astonishing range of artists. Of course, when
The Beatles arrived things started to change.
They were music pros who played their own tracks (though
Ringo Starr was
famously dropped on their first recording date in favor of a studio drummer),
and with their success came a new generation of self-supporting songwriting
acts. Time eventually passed the Wrecking Crew by, and so came the end of an
era. For a time, pop music became more of a personal singer-songwriting type of
an affair, though eventually there once again developed an era of canned acts
(e.g., Boys to Men, The Spice Girls), that returned the focus to singers and
dancers, and recreated a certain breed of largely anonymous studio musicians.
Director: Paul Justman (2002)
This is another of those documentaries that seeks to shine a
light on the makers of a sound that was as much the product of a tremendous
collection of music pros as it was the work of those who became stars and got
all the credit. What makes Standing in the Shadows of Motown a little
different is that the players who were brought together in Detroit by
producer/songwriter Barry Gordy were guys right out of Detroit's Jazz clubs,
which is to say guys from the neighborhood.
All of these musician-focused documentaries
surface the same thing, which is that when the music is right the racial
differences between the players is non-existent. This is one of the uplifting
aspects of music, part of its magic. Music transcends everything.
The Motown studio band was known as the
Funk Brothers, and like the Wrecking Crew on
the west coast, the Funk Brothers were a biracial collective of guys who grooved
on the same sounds. From a musician's perspective, the Funk Brothers' Motown
style is most interesting to break apart and analyze. The band had discovered
something elemental, a truth that has been passed from one musician to the next
ever since, which is that it is more about how you play what you play than it is
about what you play. And more than that, it is about not playing so as to give
every instrument in the band its own space. There are no conflicting sounds in a
Funk Brothers recording, no muddy parts caused by instruments competing with one
another. The Motown records, which featured heavy bass and close-miked drums,
breathed or pulsated like an organic expression. There was a naturalness to the
Motown sound that was unparalleled. Where the west coast sound of the Wrecking
Crew was all about rangy perfection, the Funk Brothers were all about feel. When
one watches the band members perform, it is often striking how little they play.
Their parts are simple, but perfectly calibrated to mesh with those of the other
musicians. They spread the tones within each chord change over the full band.
Musicianship, on that level, becomes all about listening to the folks around
you, and capturing the feel and the beat.
Motown was chased out of Detroit by the riots of
the 1960s, when Barry Gordy packed up
Hitsville USA and moved the whole affair to the west coast. Motown was never the
same after that. It became a more calculated, and in some ways more
sophisticated thing. It became Marvin Gaye
singing about social issues, where always before it had been about young people
dealing with love and romance and dance. Some of the Funk Brothers tried to move
to L.A. to continue their successful careers, but most didn't fit in on the west
coast and returned to anonymity in the clubs of Detroit. As it had for the
Wrecking Crew, the time of the Funk Brothers had passed as the pop music world
moved on to a whole other set of motivations and circumstances.
Director: Regina Russell (2014)
For sheer absurdity, you could hardly beat this documentary,
which traces the success of '80s metal band Quiet Riot,
and founding member drummer
Frankie Banali's obsessive quest for a singer to replace co-founder
Kevin DuBrow following DuBrow's death in
2007.
This movie has much in common
with a mockumentary, though not on purpose. Director Russell, who eventually
married Frankie Banali, had access to Banali's conflicted interior, and her
devotion to Banali's dream of holding this questionable musical act together
into his later years reveals some really uncomfortable aspects of human
behavior.
For one thing, Quiet Riot was a lousy band, and a
band of execrable musical tastes. They surfaced as MTV surfaced and they scored a classic video with "Cum on
Feel the Noize", which is a title that tells you all you really need to know
about Quiet Riot. They were vulgar and stupid, all on the strength of Kevin
DuBrow's outlandish metal vocals and his stage presence. He was a party animal
and a narcissist who portrayed that on stage to maximum effect. He was, for all
practical purposes, Quiet Riot. The band's history was one of constant changes
in personnel, with DuBrow even being replaced at one point before reuniting with
childhood friend Banali to keep Quiet Riot afloat in the music industry. When
the cocaine and alcohol huffing DuBrow died in Las Vegas, at age 52, he made a
remarkably pleasing corpse; in fact, looked better than he ever had in his
prime, but a lifetime of drug abuse takes its toll and DuBrow apparently died
one night in his sleep.
This movie becomes a perverse pleasure when
Frankie Banali starts holding auditions to replace his deceased friend, in
between sob fest visits to DuBrow's grave site. Quiet Riot is really all that
Banali has in his life, other than a sweetly adorable young daughter. He is a
widower as the film begins, a guy who has lost both parents and really has no
choice but to somehow continue to make Quiet Riot viable as a source of
continued income. At one point, he chooses a guy named
Mark Huff, who had been vocalist with a Van Halen tribute band, to be
their new lead singer. Banali chooses Huff because Huff could do that metal rock
vocal screaming sound, but Banali seemed not to have considered what it would
really take for someone to fill DuBrow's performance shoes. Huff has no stage presence at
all, and sometimes forgets the words to songs. Banali berates him and basically
tortures the guy into a puddle of goo until finally he starts to find his way.
Banali eventually fires Huff and moves on to another guy, and another...
This movie is really kind of sad, not because
anybody cares about Banali and DuBrow, or their brainless band, but because what
surfaces is Banali's tortured psyche, which is not a pretty thing to behold. One
imagines that his future wife, Regina Russell, saw it otherwise.